Completeness Theorems for Syllogistic Fragments

نویسنده

  • Lawrence S. Moss
چکیده

Traditional syllogisms involve sentences of the following simple forms: All X are Y , Some X are Y , No X are Y ; similar sentences with proper names as subjects, and identities between names. These sentences come with the natural semantics using subsets of a given universe, and so it is natural to ask about complete proof systems. Logical systems are important in this area due to the prominence of syllogistic arguments in human reasoning, and also to the role they have played in logic from Aristotle onwards. We present complete systems for the entire syllogistic fragment and many sub-fragments. These begin with the fragment of All sentences, for which we obtain one of the easiest completeness theorems in logic. The last system extends syllogistic reasoning with the classical boolean operations and cardinality comparisons.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Intersecting Adjectives in Syllogistic Logic

The goal of natural logic is to present and study logical systems for reasoning with sentences of (or which are reasonably close to) ordinary language. This paper explores simple systems of natural logic which make use of intersecting adjectives; these are adjectives whose interpretation does not vary with the noun they modify. Our project in this paper is to take one of the simplest syllogisti...

متن کامل

Syllogistic Logic with Complements

This paper continues the development of complete fragments of natural language by adding a noun-level complement operator to the basic syllogistic language of All X are Y and Some X are Y : in the fragment of this paper we can also say, for example, Some non-X are Y . We axiomatize this logic of this fragment in two ways: in a direct fashion, allowing the inference of an arbitrary sentence from...

متن کامل

Logics for the Relational Syllogistic

The Aristotelian syllogistic cannot account for the validity of certain inferences involving relational facts. In this paper, we investigate the prospects for providing a relational syllogistic. We identify several fragments based on (a) whether negation is permitted on all nouns, including those in the subject of a sentence; and (b) whether the subject noun phrase may contain a relative clause...

متن کامل

Suzuki-type fixed point theorems for generalized contractive mappings‎ ‎that characterize metric completeness

‎Inspired by the work of Suzuki in‎ ‎[T. Suzuki‎, ‎A generalized Banach contraction principle that characterizes metric completeness‎, Proc‎. ‎Amer‎. ‎Math‎. ‎Soc. ‎136 (2008)‎, ‎1861--1869]‎, ‎we prove a fixed point theorem for contractive mappings‎ ‎that generalizes a theorem of Geraghty in [M.A‎. ‎Geraghty‎, ‎On contractive mappings‎, ‎Proc‎. ‎Amer‎. ‎Math‎. ‎Soc., ‎40 (1973)‎, ‎604--608]‎an...

متن کامل

Towards a Formalization of Mental Model Reasoning for Syllogistic Fragments

In this study, Johnson-Laird and his colleagues’ mental model reasoning is formally analyzed as a non-sentential reasoning. Based on the recent developments in implementations of mental model theory, we formulate a mental model reasoning for syllogistic fragments in a way satisfying the requirement of formal specification such as mental model definition.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007